We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Justyna Socha from the Association and the gathered doctors drew attention to vaccine toxicity, the use of controversial ingredients in their composition, the danger of vaccinating young children (newborns - who are not sure if they are healthy), vaccinating premature babies and all children, including those just undergoing infections. The representatives of the Association pointed out that the number of vaccines has increased dramatically over the years, the number of contraindications for performing medical surgery has decreased, the problem with unreliable information provided to young parents has increased.Meanwhile, in many European Union countries vaccinations are voluntary, the youngest children are not vaccinated from the first days of life, only later when doctors have more information about the infant's health, not all children with hepatitis B and BCG are vaccinated, only those whose mothers, for example, are sick and have a real risk of passing on the infection to the infant. There are also other types of doubts - doctors point out that there is no research on how the immune system responds to antibodies, how long the vaccine is supposed to protect and to what extent it does. Unfortunately, with an increase in the number of punctures in children the number of chronic diseases is increasing, today there is talk about tsunami allergies, digestive system problems, epilepsy, diabetes.
I admit that I just wanted to "peek" what was happening during the debate, but after the first minutes I didn't have the courage to stop watching. I spent over three hours in front of the computer screen. They scared me stories of parents of childrenthat have suffered after vaccination, information on the NOP statement by 7 independent doctors, which was not sufficient evidence for Sanepid to enter NOP in the register, attempts to manipulate and falsify medical records, refusal of support and treatment, denying facts, contacting various institutions (hospitals, clinics, offices), agreeing that there was no NOP, only so that nobody would take responsibility for the situation.
Very the beginning of the speech of MP Wipler sounded sharply who pointed out that he has evidence that the not-so-recent "scaring public opinion with an alleged measles pandemic" was actually a pharmaceutical marketing operation prepared by the concerns aimed at creating a proper foundation before introducing new vaccinations in Poland.
The biggest benefit of this debate lies elsewhere - thanks to this meeting Poles could see that "madmen" and "anti-vaccines" are real people, terribly hurt, very saddened by the state of the state and disappointed by the health service, expressing their sense and often despite the passage of time , from often tragic events, with great emotions. The attitude of "power" is also significant, as its representatives not only left the room several times, most likely to answer important calls, but while speaking, they presented a low level of content, often evasively and without specificity.
I invite you to watch and form your own opinion: